In a surprising development in the Epic vs Apple case, new precedents and a lack of evidence from Epic may lead to the possibility of everything being dismissed. Apple has requested the court to set aside the injunction, citing two recent cases – Beverage vs Apple and Murthy vs Missouri – that were not considered when the injunction was originally filed. These cases establish that Apple’s anti-steering rules are fair and that plaintiffs must provide evidence of future risk. Apple argues that Epic has failed to prove how Apple’s rules directly impact its business, and suggests that the injunction could be thrown out or limited to only apply to Epic. The outcome of this latest move by Apple is uncertain, as it will likely face appeals and further arguments in the coming months. Ultimately, the decision rests with the court.
This article was first published at Source link . You can check them out for other stuffs