The reviews for the iPhone 16e are out and they are mediocre at best. Apple has introduced the iPhone 16e as a replacement for the discontinued iPhone SE, but it comes with compromises to bring the price down by $200 compared to the base iPhone 16 model. Initial reviews suggest that while the iPhone 16e is not disliked outright, it faces tough competition from used and refurbished models that may offer a better deal.
Engadget’s Cherlynn Low criticizes the iPhone 16e for missing key features like MagSafe, making it feel like a step back in time. However, the battery life, display, and performance receive positive feedback. Marques Brownlee questions the target audience for the iPhone 16e, highlighting the absence of MagSafe and subpar camera performance compared to other models.
Allison Johnson from The Verge points out that the iPhone 16e embodies both the strengths and weaknesses of iOS, with Android devices offering better features at a lower price. The decision between the iPhone 16e and the slightly pricier iPhone 15 depends on individual preferences, such as the importance of features like MagSafe and Apple Intelligence.
Despite its lower price point, The Wall Street Journal’s Nicole Nguyen suggests that older discounted models may be more appealing to some users. The absence of MagSafe in the iPhone 16e is a downside for those who value the convenience of magnetic accessories. Overall, while the iPhone 16e offers some modern features, it may not be the best choice for every consumer.